Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Walton Cantt Board violates rules in tender
04-27-2012, 12:57 PM
Post: #1
Walton Cantt Board violates rules in tender
Walton Cantt Board violates rules in tender


Lahore : The Walton Cantonment Board (WCB) has made sheer violation of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules by awarding tender of cleanness of DHA-V and other adjacent areas to the highest bidder



The Board has also violated rule 13 of the PRRA which calls for giving 15 days response time before making any procurement.



According to the documents available with The News, the WCB had given an advertisement on March 2, 2012 in section of newspaper of tender notice for hiring the services of a company who will ensure cleanness in DHA-V Extension-N, Main Boulevard, and Charar village for one year period, renewable upto three years.



Interestingly, the WCB had given only three days response time as it stated in the tender published to submit the sealed tender bids by March 5 2012 to its office till 11:00 am while the tender would be opened same day at 1:00pm in the presence of the bidding party representatives.



According to rule 13 (1) of PPRA which deals with the response time reads: “The procuring agency may decide the response time for receipt of bids or proposals (including proposals for pre-qualification) from the date of publication of an advertisement or notice, keeping in view the individual procurement’s complexity, availability and urgency. However, under no circumstances the response time shall be less than fifteen days for national competitive bidding and thirty days for international competitive bidding from the date of publication of advertisement or notice. All advertisements or notices shall expressly mention the response time allowed for that particular procurement along with the information for collection of bid documents which shall be issued till a given date, allowing sufficient time to complete and submit the bid by the closing date”.



Similarly, the WCB ignored the lowest bidder who submitted Rs 825,000 per month bid and awarded tender to the highest bidder who had given rate of cleanness services of Rs 11,25,000 per month which is almost 33 per cent higher than the lowest bidder.



When contacted, the Cantonment Executive Officer of Walton Cantt Khurshed Ali said that tender was not awarded to the lowest bidder as the Board had earlier terminated the services of that bidder on the complaint of the DHA. He argued once a service user complained about the service provider how the board re-hired the services of the same service provider for the same user. However, he expressed his unawareness about the violation of the PPRA rule 13(1) which related with the response time. Rather, he said, no objection was raised by the lowest bidder in this regard and it had managed to participate in the bidding even limited response time, thus it would not be an objection on bidding process. On the other hand, when contacted, the head of the lowest bidding company, Tahir Mehmood, said that the WBC had never terminated their services ever. He said that the company was providing its services to the many other areas of the cantonment and other parts of the city successfully and previously it was providing the same services in the advertised areas of the DHA as well. After completion of the agreement the Board had issued a letter to the company as well and did not continue the service, he said. “If our company was blacklisted then how the tender document was issued to us as it was issued to the pre-qualified service providers”, he argued.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  GIEDA had Completely Ignored the Rules in allotting Commercial & Industrial plots LRE-Azan 0 2,271 01-03-2018 04:43 PM
Last Post: LRE-Azan
  CDA board defers approval of plots restoration policy Salman 0 2,577 02-13-2014 12:23 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Metro bus: Steps for pre-qualification of contractors taken in accordance with rules Salman 0 3,510 02-11-2014 12:23 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Deviation From Rules – Properties Demolished At Three Places Salman 0 5,461 11-28-2013 03:35 PM
Last Post: Salman
  New Rules Issued For Property Transfer, Taxation And Auction Salman 0 7,074 11-12-2013 03:35 PM
Last Post: Salman
  DHA City Karachi Issues Tender Notice For Development Work Salman 0 10,711 10-31-2013 02:30 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Pakistan floats tender for major road construction Salman 0 6,862 09-02-2013 12:48 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Maximising revenue: CDA board weighs proposals to diversify sources of income Salman 0 2,832 05-10-2013 11:21 AM
Last Post: Salman
  CDA board forms half a dozen committees for implementation Salman 0 2,656 05-01-2013 03:58 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Island City violates Ramsar Convention: WWF Salman 0 2,078 04-01-2013 12:32 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Developers directed to follow building rules Salman 0 3,334 01-23-2013 01:20 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Digging work on road sans NOC RDA halts Cantt Board’s project Salman 0 3,363 10-13-2012 04:43 PM
Last Post: Salman
  Senate body directs FBR to finalise CGT rules Salman 0 2,862 06-08-2012 01:22 PM
Last Post: Salman
  CDA set to open tender for development tomorrow Salman 0 3,789 05-22-2012 11:37 AM
Last Post: Salman
  ISLAMABAD: NAB board discusses Parliamentarian Enclave scandal Lahore_Real_Estate 0 4,878 01-27-2012 12:24 PM
Last Post: Lahore_Real_Estate
  NAB board discusses housing scheme scandal Lahore_Real_Estate 0 3,474 01-26-2012 01:08 PM
Last Post: Lahore_Real_Estate
  Flyover on Walton Road praised Lahore_Real_Estate 0 2,473 09-15-2011 03:27 PM
Last Post: Lahore_Real_Estate
  DHA Executive Board briefed on mega projects Lahore_Real_Estate 0 2,353 07-01-2011 01:42 PM
Last Post: Lahore_Real_Estate
  Rules of Nature (Javed Ch) LRE 0 2,145 06-01-2011 12:35 AM
Last Post: LRE
  Punjab notifies amended rules on land lease Lahore_Real_Estate 0 2,450 04-16-2011 12:39 PM
Last Post: Lahore_Real_Estate

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)